InsightsInsights

Shareholders' Agreement vs. Company Constitution: What's the Difference?

Understanding the difference between a Shareholders' Agreement and Company Constitution under the Malaysia Companies Act 2016.

Lawgistics January 1, 2025 5 min read

Taking on a co-founder, partner, or investor in your Malaysian company means you'll hear about both of these documents. Many founders assume one replaces the other. It doesn't — and confusing the two is a costly mistake.

The Company Constitution

Under the Companies Act 2016, a Malaysian company may adopt a Constitution (replacing the old Memorandum & Articles of Association). The Constitution is a public document filed with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) and governs the internal rules of the company — share classes, director powers, meeting procedures, dividend rights, and transfer restrictions.

Because it's a public document, commercially sensitive agreements between shareholders should never be placed in the Constitution.

The Shareholders' Agreement

A Shareholders' Agreement (SHA) is a private contract between shareholders. It sits alongside the Constitution and governs the relationship between shareholders in detail: board composition, veto rights, drag-along and tag-along rights, anti-dilution, exit mechanisms, and what happens when shareholders deadlock.

Key differences

  • Privacy:SHA is private. Constitution is public.
  • Flexibility:SHA can be amended by the agreeing parties. Constitution requires a special resolution of shareholders.
  • Enforceability:Constitution binds all current and future shareholders. SHA only binds signatories.

In practice, most well-structured Malaysian companies have both — a Constitution setting out the basic governance framework, and an SHA containing the commercial arrangements between investors and founders.